What distinguishes this page from any other games guide is not the number of sections — much the same across dozens of platforms — but the published return figures. This is one of the few cases where an external reviewer gathered detailed return data for individual games, and that data goes uninterpreted despite being available.
A map of the sections
| Section | Source of the outcome | Main provider | Documented return range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Slots | Random number generator | Eighteen declared studios | Varies by game |
| Live casino | Cards and a wheel in front of a camera | Evolution Gaming and Ezugi | 99.28% for live blackjack |
| Digital blackjack tables | Random number generator | Play'n GO and others | From 98.74% to 99.89% |
| Video poker | Random number generator | Microgaming | From 93.45% to 99.92% |
| Other games | Varied | Varied | 86 titles classified as "other" |
The row before "other" is the most important: a range running from 93.45% to 99.92% inside a single section and from a single developer. That gap is wider than any gap between platforms themselves, which is why it is set out in detail below.
The live casino: an Evolution Gaming integration
The live section was built on Evolution Gaming alongside Ezugi, two of the largest providers in the field. The tables covered blackjack, baccarat and roulette in high-definition streaming with real dealers.
The essential difference from the rest of the catalogue is not the format but the source of the outcome: here it comes from real cards and a physical wheel in front of a camera in a studio, not from an algorithm. The effect on return is tangible — the documented return for Evolution live blackjack was 99.28%, lower than the best digital versions because a human table's pace is slower and its rules more conservative.
Two practical observations concerning readers in the Arab region, appearing in no source.
First, the live tables were run in English, and the declared interface languages were English and Finnish — with another source adding Swedish. Interaction with the dealer is a core part of this section's experience, and the absence of Arabic means part of its value never reached an Arabic-speaking player at all.
Second, support operated until eleven at night GMT — that is, until two in the morning Kuwait time.
Blackjack: from 98.74% to 99.89% depending on the version
| Version | Provider | Return | Note on the rules |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blackjack — live | Ezugi | 99.89% | Eight decks — the highest documented return in the section |
| Blackjack — live | Evolution Gaming | 99.28% | A standard live table |
| Single Deck Blackjack | Play'n GO | 98.74% | A single deck |
A result contrary to common expectation. It is widely believed that single-deck blackjack gives a higher return, because card counting is theoretically easier. The data here says the opposite: the eight-deck version recorded 99.89% while the single-deck version recorded 98.74% — a gap of more than a full percentage point in favour of the former.
The reason is that deck count is not the only determinant of return. Table rules — when the dealer stands, whether doubling after a split is allowed, and how blackjack pays — matter more than the number of decks. And single-deck versions are usually paired with stricter rules that offset the theoretical advantage.
Video poker: the largest gap in the whole catalogue
Two games from the same developer
| Game | Return | House edge | Theoretical cost per 1,000 euros |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Aces — Microgaming | 99.92% | 0.08% | About 0.80 euros |
| Louisiana Double — Microgaming | 93.45% | 6.55% | About 65.50 euros |
This is the strongest example in the whole file, because both games come from the same developer and sit in the same category. The developer does not determine return; the game does. And yet every review examined organises its information by studio name, the least informative criterion available.
Video poker is also among the categories affected by player decisions: which cards are held is what realises the stated return or falls short of it. The published rate assumes optimal play on every hand.
The digital table against the live table
The digital table
The outcome is generated by a random number generator. No waiting for other players or for the dealer's cycle, so the pace is far faster and the minimum stake usually lower.
The live table
The outcome comes from cards and a physical wheel in front of a camera. The pace is slower by the human nature of the round, and the minimum stake generally higher.
What was not in the catalogue
- A sportsbook section — mentioned in none of the sources examined. The platform was purely a casino.
- Player-versus-player poker rooms — what existed was video poker and tables against the dealer, entirely different products.
- An Arabic interface — the declared languages were English and Finnish per one source, with Swedish added per another. The two sources differ on the count and agree on the absence of Arabic.
- Cryptocurrencies — unsupported; the platform was entirely fiat.
The last two points confirm what appears in every section of this file: the Arab region was never a target market at any stage, consistent with sixteen Arab countries appearing on the restriction list.
Four criteria for assessing any platform's games section
| Criterion | Why it matters | What it revealed here |
|---|---|---|
| Is the return rate published per game? | A genuinely distinguishing criterion — most platforms do not publish it | Gathered by an external reviewer, not the platform |
| Which version of the game is available? | The gap within a single developer can exceed six percentage points | From 93.45% to 99.92% at Microgaming |
| Who supplies the live section? | It determines stream quality, table count and limits | Evolution Gaming and Ezugi |
| What is the pace of the section you play in? | Pace determines actual spend more than stake size does | Digital tables are far faster than live ones |
Frequently asked questions
Who supplied the live casino section?
Evolution Gaming alongside Ezugi, two of the largest providers in the field. The section covered blackjack, baccarat and roulette in high-definition streaming with real dealers, and the documented return for Evolution live blackjack was 99.28%.
What was the highest blackjack return on the site?
99.89% for the Ezugi live version on eight decks. This runs contrary to common expectation, since the Play'n GO single-deck version recorded a lower return of 98.74%. The reason is that table rules affect return more than deck count does.
What is the difference between a digital and a live table?
A digital table generates its outcome with a random number generator, so its pace is faster and its minimum stake lower — meaning a higher cumulative wager in the same period. A live table's outcome comes from cards and a physical wheel in front of a camera, so its pace is slower and its minimum generally higher, with dealer interaction added.
Did Untold have a sportsbook section?
No. No sportsbook section is mentioned in any of the sources examined. The platform was purely a casino comprising slots, tables, live casino and video poker, with no bookmaker and no player-versus-player poker rooms.